[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Social Network Membership
Linkedin
Researchgate
..
Indexing Databases
..
DOI
کلیک کنید
..
ِDOR
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 4 (12-2023) ::
ieijqp 2023, 12(4): 37-45 Back to browse issues page
Determining the optimal policy in condition-based maintenance for electrical panels
Saba Nasersarraf1 , Shervin Asadzadeh * 1, Yaser Samimi2
1- North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (620 Views)

In electrical industry, companies are looking for ways to reduce costs while improving and maintaining reliability of equipment in repair and maintenance category. In this paper condition-based maintenance model in parallel electricity distribution network is studied. A single control limit is determined for all components to minimize a total expected cost during planning horizon subject to reliability constraint of the whole parallel system. Considering the covariate values on the component’s deterioration, proportional hazard model is adopted and we provide a closed-form of analytical solution for the reliability of tampered failure rate load-sharing system. It means failure of one component will affect the failure rate of other components. In this research between both inspection points, if component fails, a minimal repair action must be performed, so we have two cost types for each component; the cost of minimal repair and the cost of replacement. At each inspection point, the failure rate is measured and compared with the optimal control limit decided in the previous step. If it exceeds the control limit, the system must be replaced and the replacement cost is considered, but if it does not exceed the control limit, it will continue to work until the next inspection point without performing any maintenance. Inspection points are performed based on amount of failure age-dependent and the value of covariate variables in time intervals. Modeling a multi-component system is challenging due to the interdependence of the failure behavior among the components and determining the optimal control limit for preventive replacement. Although different research works have been done in the literature on condition-based maintenance models, there is a research gap in considering the failure dependency of components. Most of them consider independent failure between the components or the degree of failure dependency is precisely specified.  It can cause inefficient analysis and incorrect assessment of the situation.
The proposed nonlinear programming model has been evaluated with MATLAB software. This plan helps the technicians to control the reliability of the system and the operation of the components at a higher level by considering the failure dependency between the components during the inspection periods. Furthermore, they are informed about failures earlier, before incurring the replacement costs. The results show that the network reliability of the proposed model has a better performance than the basic model. At the end, in order to confirm the effectiveness of the approach, a case study of the electrical panel is examined.

 

Keywords: Condition-based maintenance, Parallel system, Reliability, Proportional hazard, Modeling
Full-Text [PDF 1703 kb]   (64 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2023/05/12 | Accepted: 2023/08/19 | Published: 2023/12/23
References
1. Arabzadeh Jamali, M., & Pham, H. (2022). Opportunistic maintenance model for load sharing k-out-of-n systems with perfect PM and minimal repairs. Quality Engineering, 34(2), 205-214. [DOI:10.1080/08982112.2022.2033774]
2. Asadzadeh, S., Aghaie, A., Shahriari, H., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2014). The application of proportional hazards and frailty models to multistage processes surveillance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 74, 461-470. [DOI:10.1007/s00170-014-5914-4]
3. Banjevic, D., Jardine, A. K. S., Makis, V., & Ennis, M. (2001). A control-limit policy and software for condition-based maintenance optimization. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 39(1), 32-50. [DOI:10.1080/03155986.2001.11732424]
4. Ghasemi, A., Yacout, S., & Ouali, M. S. (2007). Optimal condition-based maintenance with imperfect information and the proportional hazards model. International journal of production research, 45(4), 989-1012. [DOI:10.1080/00207540600596882]
5. Golmakani, H. R., & Fattahipour, F. (2011). Age‐based inspection scheme for condition‐based maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 93-110. [DOI:10.1108/13552511111116277]
6. Golmakani, H. R., & Moakedi, H. (2012). Optimal non-periodic inspection scheme for a multi-component repairable system using A∗ search algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(4), 1038-1047. [DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2012.07.002]
7. Jardine, A. K. S., Joseph, T., & Banjevic, D. (1999). Optimizing condition‐based maintenance decisions for equipment subject to vibration monitoring. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5(3), 192-202. [DOI:10.1108/13552519910282647]
8. Keizer, M. C. O., Teunter, R. H., Veldman, J., & Babai, M. Z. (2018). Condition-based maintenance for systems with economic dependence and load sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 319-327. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.030]
9. Keizer, M. C. O., Teunter, R. H., & Veldman, J. (2017). Joint condition-based maintenance and inventory optimization for systems with multiple components. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 209-222. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.047]
10. Lawless, J. F. (2011). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Makis, V., & Jardine, A. K. (1992). Optimal replacement in the proportional hazards model. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 30(1), 172-183. [DOI:10.1080/03155986.1992.11732183]
12. Pozsgai, P., Neher, W., & Bertsche, B. (2003, January). Models to consider load-sharing in reliability calculation and simulation of systems consisting of mechanical components. In Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003. (pp. 493-499). IEEE.
13. Rykov, V., Ivanova, N., & Kochetkova, I. (2022). Reliability Analysis of a Load-Sharing k-out-of-n System Due to Its Components' Failure. Mathematics, 10(14), 2457. [DOI:10.3390/math10142457]
14. Smidt-Destombes, K. S. D., van der Heijden, M. C., & van Harten, A. (2004). On the availability of a k-out-of-N system given limited spares and repair capacity under a condition-based maintenance strategy. Reliability engineering & System safety, 83(3), 287-300. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2003.10.004]
15. Van der Weide, J. A., Pandey, M. D., & van Noortwijk, J. M. (2010). Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(3), 236-246. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.004]
16. Van Horenbeek, A., & Pintelon, L. (2013). A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems. Reliability engineering & system safety, 120, 39-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.029]
17. Wang, X., Zhao, X., Wu, C., & Wang, S. (2022). Mixed shock model for multi-state weighted k-out-of-n: F systems with degraded resistance against shocks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 217, 108098. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2021.108098]
18. Yahyatabar, A., & Najafi, A. A. (2018). A multi-stage stochastic programming for condition-based maintenance with proportional hazards model. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 12(1), 18-38.
19. Yahyatabar, A., & Najafi, A. A. (2018). Condition based maintenance policy for series-parallel systems through Proportional Hazards Model: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 30-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.014]
20. Zhang, N., Fouladirad, M., Barros, A., & Zhang, J. (2020). Condition-based maintenance for a K-out-of-N deteriorating system under periodic inspection with failure dependence. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(1), 159-167. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.041]
21. Zhang, N., & Si, W. (2020). Deep reinforcement learning for condition-based maintenance planning of multi-component systems under dependent competing risks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 107094. [DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107094]
22. Zhang, Z., Wu, S., Lee, S., & Ni, J. (2014). Modified iterative aggregation procedure for maintenance optimisation of multi-component systems with failure interaction. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(12), 2480-2489. [DOI:10.1080/00207721.2013.771759]
23. Zhang, Z., Wu, S., Li, B., & Lee, S. (2015). (n, N) type maintenance policy for multi-component systems with failure interactions. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(6), 1051-1064. [DOI:10.1080/00207721.2013.807386]


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nasersarraf S, Asadzadeh S, Samimi Y. Determining the optimal policy in condition-based maintenance for electrical panels. ieijqp 2023; 12 (4) :37-45
URL: http://ieijqp.ir/article-1-958-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 4 (12-2023) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علمی- پژوهشی کیفیت و بهره وری صنعت برق ایران Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645